{"id":5922,"date":"2020-10-13T21:39:17","date_gmt":"2020-10-13T21:39:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.crimt.net\/seminaires-reguliers\/"},"modified":"2025-03-07T20:18:40","modified_gmt":"2025-03-07T20:18:40","slug":"seminaires-reguliers","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/seminaires-reguliers\/","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

16 April 2024<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Emmanuelle Mazuyer<\/strong> (CERCRID, Universit\u00e9 Lyon 2), Benjamin Dubrion<\/strong> (Sciences Po Lyon), Mathilde Julien <\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 Lyon 1) & Ren\u00e9e-Claude Drouin<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al)<\/p>\n\n\n

Hybrid seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Dans une approche renouvel\u00e9e du taylorisme: r\u00e9sultats du projet TraPlaNum sur les micro-t\u00e2ches de travail<\/p>\n\n

Digital labor platforms are often perceived merely as intermediaries connecting clients with a diverse array of workers whose legal status remains ambiguous. However, in recent years, their operational models have garnered attention for fostering new forms of work that blur the lines of traditional employment. These platforms frequently extend beyond the role of a mere intermediary, sometimes engaging in practices reminiscent of those of an employer.

At the intersection of law and economics, this seminar aimed to explore how legal frameworks, particularly in France, govern the employment relationships between platforms and workers. It specifically focused on micro-task platforms that offer short, simple, and repetitive tasks, echoing the principles of Taylorism. This analysis was preceded by a review of more widely recognized mobility platforms.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

16 May 2023<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

John Peters<\/strong>\u00a0(Memorial University), Judy Fudge<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 McMaster), Ian MacDonald<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al), Jim Stanford<\/strong> (Centre for Future Work) & Gregor Murray<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Jobs with Inequality: Financialization, Post-Democracy, and Labour Market Deregulation in Canada<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n\n

The Interuniversity Research Centre on Globalization and Work (CRIMT) and the Canadian Industrial Relations Association (ACRI-CIRA) were pleased to host a public webinar focused on John Peters’ book titled Jobs with Inequality: Financialization, Post-Democracy, and Labour Market Deregulation in Canada (University of Toronto Press, 2022).

Utilizing new fiscal and income data, John Peters explores the emergence of inequality in Canada by examining the concepts of post-democracy, financialization, and labor market deregulation. Timely and innovative, Jobs with Inequality elucidates how and why businesses and governments have been able to reshape economic rules to benefit a select few, while also analyzing the reasons behind the consistent failures of progressive efforts to reverse these trends.

During this discussion with the author, Judy Fudge (McMaster University), Ian MacDonald (University of Montreal), and Jim Stanford (Centre for Future Work) shared their key insights from the book. The conversation was moderated by Gregor Murray (University of Montreal).


\"\"<\/a> <\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

10 May 2023<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Justice Rosalie Abella<\/strong>, Dionne Pohler<\/strong>\u00a0(University of Saskatchewan), Gilles Trudeau<\/strong> (CRIMT, Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al), Adelle Blackett<\/strong>\u00a0(CRIMT, McGill University), Steven Barrett<\/strong>\u00a0(Goldblatt Partners),\u00a0Louis Lebel\u00a0<\/strong>(ancien juge de la Cour supr\u00eame du Canada), Kerry Rittich<\/strong>\u00a0(University of Toronto),\u00a0Gregor Murray<\/strong>\u00a0(CRIMT, Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Canadian Freedom of Association Award<\/p>\n\n

In 2016, the Canadian Industrial Relations Association (CIRA) announced a significant donation from Professor Emeritus Roy J. Adams to establish an annual award. This award aims to recognize the exceptional contributions of an individual or organization to the understanding and respect for international standards related to the right to unionize and collective bargaining, to which Canada is committed.

In 2022, this honor was awarded to the Honorable Rosalie Abella, a retired Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada. Throughout her career, Justice Abella has been dedicated to advocating for, promoting, and upholding fundamental human rights and freedoms, including the right to associate, the right to unionize, and the right to engage in collective bargaining.

That year, CIRA partnered with the Interuniversity Research Centre on Globalization and Work (CRIMT) to host a virtual award ceremony, which took the form of an interactive roundtable discussion.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

6 March 2023<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Ian Greer<\/strong>\u00a0(ILR School, Cornell University), Charles Umney<\/strong>\u00a0(Leeds University),\u00a0\u00c9tienne Cantin<\/strong>\u00a0(Universit\u00e9 Laval),\u00a0Philippe Pochet<\/strong>\u00a0(ETUI),\u00a0Valeria Pulignano<\/strong>\u00a0(KU Leuven) & Vincent Pasquier<\/strong>\u00a0(HEC Montr\u00e9al)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Marketization.\u00a0How Capitalist Exchange Disciplines Workers and Subverts Democracy<\/em><\/p>\n\n

The CRIMT was pleased to invite the public to participate in a webinar focused on the book by Ian Greer (ILR School, Cornell University) and Charles Umney (Leeds University) titled Marketization: How Capitalist Exchange Disciplines Workers and Subverts Democracy (London: Bloomsbury, 2022). This work explores how the state and capital utilize markets to discipline the working class. The authors provide a comprehensive overview of European political economy, from the European Commission to the workplace itself, demonstrating how neoliberal principles manifest as market mechanisms that transform the lives of workers.

During this informal discussion with the authors, \u00c9tienne Cantin (Universit\u00e9 Laval), Philippe Pochet (ETUI), and Valeria Pulignano (KU Leuven) shared the key insights they gained from the book. Vincent Pasquier (HEC Montr\u00e9al) served as the facilitator for this conversation.


\"\"<\/a> <\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

30 January 2023<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Anthony Giles<\/strong> (Affaires internationales et intergouvernementales du travail, Programme du travail, Emploi et D\u00e9veloppement social Canada), Brian Burkett <\/strong>(Conseil canadien des employeurs), Hassan Yussuff <\/strong>(Congr\u00e8s du travail du Canada), Larry Brown<\/strong> (National Union of Public and General Employees) &\u00a0Gregor Murray<\/strong>\u00a0(CRIMT, Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Canadian Freedom of Association Award<\/p>\n\n

In 2016, the Canadian Industrial Relations Association (CIRA) announced a significant donation from Professor Emeritus Roy J. Adams to establish an annual award. This award aims to honor the exceptional contributions of individuals or organizations to the understanding and respect for international standards related to the right to unionize and engage in collective bargaining, to which Canada is committed.

The 2021 Canadian Freedom of Association Award was presented to individuals and organizations that played a pivotal role in the ratification of the ILO Convention No. 98 on the right to organize and collective bargaining (1949). This event is particularly significant as it marks Canada’s ratification of the eighth fundamental convention of the International Labour Organization (ILO). The recipients included Anthony Giles and the International and Intergovernmental Labour Affairs, Employment and Social Development Canada; Brian Burkett and the Canadian Employers Council; Hassan Yussuff and the Canadian Labour Congress; as well as Larry Brown and the National Union of Public and General Employees.

That year, CIRA partnered with the Interuniversity Research Centre on Globalization and Work (CRIMT) to host a virtual award ceremony, which took the form of an interactive roundtable discussion.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

24 November 2022<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Milagros Miceli\u00a0<\/strong>(Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society \/Distributed AI Research Institut), Kelle Howson<\/strong> (Research ICT Africa & Institute for Economic Justice), Cl\u00e9ment Le Ludec <\/strong>(T\u00e9l\u00e9com Paris –\u00a0Institut polytechnique de Paris), Maxime Cornet<\/strong><\/strong> (T\u00e9l\u00e9com Paris –\u00a0Institut polytechnique de Paris), Julian Posada<\/strong> (Yale University), Kai-Hsin\u00a0Hung<\/strong> (HEC Montr\u00e9al)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Critical AI and Labour: Power, Value Chains, and Reproduction<\/p>\n\n

CRIMT joined OBVIA for this online workshop entitled\u00a0Critical AI and Labour: Power, Value Chains, and Reproduction.<\/em>\u00a0It gathered global experts examining the\u00a0countless workers who are required to help build, maintain, and test artificial intelligence (AI) systems in what Mary Gray and Siddharth Suri at Microsoft Research refer to as \u201cghost work\u201d and what Lilly Irani calls \u201chuman-fuelled automation.\u201d It opened with an inquiry into a\u00a0power-aware perspective of \u201cstudying up\u201d machine learning (ML) datasets. Then, it examined the workers in the global value chains of AI production between France and Madagascar. Lastly, it expanded this by looking at the unsustainable reproductive labour it requires on families and communities. It ended with a lively discussion of possible solutions with the audience and members of the wider AI and labour communities.\u00a0

\"\"<\/a> <\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

4 October 2022<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Alessandro Delfanti<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Toronto, Institute of
Communication, Culture, Information and Technology)<\/p>\n\n\n

Hybrid seminar<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

How algorithms and robots are affecting work in Amazon
Warehouses<\/p>\n\n

Dr. Alessandro Delfanti researches labour and technology, the politics of digital media, and digital countercultures. He recently published a book titled The Warehouse: Humans and Robots at Amazon<\/em>, which addresses the relation between living labour and technology at the e-commerce giant. He also organized the international conference Log Out! Worker Resistance Within and Against the Platform Economy<\/em>. Another research focus is the role of robots in re-organizing the
labour process. In his previous work, he has theorized the relation between hacking and digital capitalism.

In this seminar, the author explored the way algorithms and robots are affecting work in Amazon Warehouses.

\"\"<\/a> <\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

31 March 2021<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Joel Bakan<\/strong> (University of British Columbia), Rose Batt<\/strong> (Cornell University), Isabelle Ferreras <\/strong>(UCLouvain), Isabelle Martin<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al), John Peters<\/strong> (Laurentian University), Jim Stanford<\/strong> (Centre for Future Work), Gregor Murray<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

The New Corporation. The webinar<\/p>\n\n

With CEO compensation soaring, income inequality at all-time highs, the planet facing ecological disaster, and democracy in a precarious situation, Joel Bakan and Jennifer Abbott have again teamed up to make the movie The New Corporation: The Unfortunately Necessary Sequel<\/em>.<\/span><\/a> And, in printed form, from the author of The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power <\/em>(2004) comes The New Corporation: How \u201cGood\u201d Corporations are Bad for Democracy<\/span><\/a><\/em> (2020).

This cry for social justice, deeper democracy and transformative solutions merits close attention from researchers and actors in the world of work. This is why we convened a conversation in the form of a webinar on The New Corporation<\/em>, which took place on Wednesday, March 31st.<\/strong> It was an opportunity to bring together the book author and movie co-creator, Joel Bakan, with a stellar cast of specialists in a dialogue about corporations, work and democracy.

This Conversation on The New Corporation was an initiative of the CRIMT Partnership on Institutional Experimentation for Better Work<\/strong>, in collaboration with the Canadian Association for Work & Labour studies (CAWLS)<\/strong> and the Canadian Industrial Relations Association (CIRA)<\/strong>.

\"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

24 March 2021<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Karel Musilek <\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong>(Cardiff Business School)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Working Lives Beyond Balance and Encroachment: Form of work\/life in coliving<\/p>\n\n

Sociological discussion of working and economic lives has tended to focus on questions of work\/life balance and encroachment of work into non-work life. While this research provides useful insights, it has insufficiently reflected the transformation to practices and socio-material arrangements of working lives. Yet, it is within these practices and arrangements where the important extensive demands and intensification of work are accommodated and reproduced.

To start rectifying this lacuna, the author draws on and extend the notion of \u2018forms of life\u2019 as a lens through which to conceptualize working lives, how they are shaped and what social practices and arrangements sustain them. He explores this issue through a unique ethnographic study of coliving – a new way of living and novel site of sociological investigation – which seeks to modify domestic and personal lives in lines with demands of extensive and intensive work and ideals of professional and entrepreneurial success.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

18 November 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Julie Battilana<\/strong> (Harvard University), Isabelle Ferreras <\/strong><\/strong>(UCLouvain), Marguerite Mendell <\/strong>(Concordia University), Gregor Murray<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al), Andrew Jackson<\/strong> (Broadbent Institute), Esteban Kelly<\/strong> (U.S. Federation of Worker Cooperatives), Lana Payne <\/strong>(UNIFOR), Jim Stanford<\/strong> (Centre for Future Work)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Democratizing Work: A Conversation on the Lessons of the Current Pandemic for the World of Work<\/p>\n\n

\u201cWorking humans are so much more than \u2018resources\u2019<\/em>. This is one of the central lessons of the current crisis.\u201d So begins a manifesto drafted in the spring of 2020 in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, which argues that work needs to be democratized, de-commodified and made sustainable. <\/p>\n\n

The Manifesto<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a> has been translated in multiple languages and supported across the globe. This conversation on Democratizing Work, which took take place on Wednesday November 18th<\/sup>, was an opportunity to being together its authors with leading representatives and specialists from the world of work in a conversation about the Manifesto and current priorities for the pandemic and beyond.<\/p>\n\n

The Conversation on Democratizing Work is an initiative of the CRIMT Partnership on Institutional Experimentation for Better Work<\/em>, the Karl Polanyi Institute<\/span><\/a><\/em>, and the Industry 4.0, Work and Employment<\/em> Axis<\/em> of the International Observatory of the Societal Impacts of AI and Digital Technology<\/span><\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

17 November 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Adelle Blackett <\/strong><\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 McGill), Isabelle Ferreras <\/strong><\/strong>(UCLouvain), Dominique M\u00e9da <\/strong><\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 Paris-Dauphine), Marguerite Mendell <\/strong><\/strong>(Concordia University), Gregor Murray <\/strong><\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al), Nil Ataogul <\/strong><\/strong>(Syndicat des travailleurs et travailleuses unis de l’alimentation et du commerce), Pierre-Antoine Harvey <\/strong><\/strong>(Centrale des syndicats du Qu\u00e9bec), Jos\u00e9e Lamoureux <\/strong><\/strong>(Conf\u00e9d\u00e9ration des syndicats nationaux), Jonathan Vall\u00e9e-Payette <\/strong><\/strong>(F\u00e9d\u00e9ration des travailleurs et travailleuses du Qu\u00e9bec)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

D\u00e9mocratiser le travail: une conversation sur les le\u00e7ons \u00e0 tirer de la pand\u00e9mie<\/p>\n\n

\u201cWorking humans are so much more than \u2018resources\u2019<\/em>. This is one of the central lessons of the current crisis.\u201d So begins a manifesto drafted in the spring of 2020 in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, which argues that work needs to be democratized, de-commodified and made sustainable. <\/p>\n\n

The Manifesto<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/a> has been translated in multiple languages and supported across the globe. This conversation on Democratizing Work (in French), which took take place on Tuesday November 17th<\/sup>, was an opportunity to being together its authors with leading representatives and specialists from the world of work in a conversation about the Manifesto and current priorities for the pandemic and beyond.<\/p>\n\n

The Conversation on Democratizing Work is an initiative of the CRIMT Partnership on Institutional Experimentation for Better Work<\/em>, the Karl Polanyi Institute<\/span><\/a><\/em> and the Industry 4.0, Work and Employment<\/em> Axis<\/em> of the International Observatory of the Societal Impacts of AI and Digital Technology<\/span><\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

13 November 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Genevieve LeBaron <\/strong><\/strong>(University of Sheffield), Judy Fudge<\/strong> (McMaster University), Jonelle Humphrey<\/strong> (McMaster University)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Combatting Modern Slavery. A conversation with Genevieve LeBaron, author of Combatting Modern Slavery: Why Labour Governance is Failing and What we Can do about it<\/p>\n\n

Goal 8.7 of the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals calls on governments, companies and civil society to \u201ctake immediate and effective measures to eradicate forced labour and end modern slavery\u201d. In her important new book Combatting Modern Slavery: Why Labour Governance is Failing and What Can we Do about it. (Polity 2020)<\/strong><\/em>, Professor Genevieve LaBaron<\/strong> lifts the lid on a labour governance regime that is severely flawed and limited. She takes a close-up look at the millions of corporate dollars spent on anti-slavery networks, NGO partnerships, lobbying for new transparency legislation, and investment in social auditing and ethical certification schemes, to show how such efforts serve to bolster corporate growth and legitimacy as well as government reputations, whilst failing to protect the world\u2019s most vulnerable workers. <\/p>\n\n

In this online seminar, Judy Fudge<\/strong> (McMaster University) and Jonelle Humphrey<\/strong> (CRIMT PhD student and recipient of the Shirley Goldenberg-CRIMT Scholarship) conducted an in-depth conversation with the author about her book. <\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

7 May 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Isabelle Ferreras <\/strong><\/strong>(UCLouvain), Dalia Gesualdi-Fecteau<\/strong> (UQAM), M\u00e9lanie Laroche<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al), Dominique M\u00e9da<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 Paris-Dauphine)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Travail et exp\u00e9rimentation au temps de la Covid-19<\/p>\n\n

During the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, CRIMT’s Partnership Project on Institutional Experimentation and Work Improvement held two exploratory roundtables on the pandemic, its disruptive effects on work and employment, and the organizational and institutional experiments it is generating. The second in the series, the May 7, 2020 roundtable presented contributions from Isabelle Ferreras<\/strong> (TED-CriDIS, UCLouvain), Dalia Gesualdi-Fecteau<\/strong> (UQAM), M\u00e9lanie Laroche<\/strong> (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al) and Dominique M\u00e9da <\/strong>(IRISSO, Universit\u00e9 Paris-Dauphine).<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

30 April 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Glenn Morgan <\/strong><\/strong>(University of Bristol), Valeria Pulignano <\/strong><\/strong>(KU Leuven), Ian Greer <\/strong><\/strong>(Cornell University), Shelagh Campbell <\/strong><\/strong>(University of Regina), Kevin Banks<\/strong><\/strong> (Queen’s University)<\/p>\n\n\n

Virtual platform<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Work and Experimentation in the (post-) Covid-19 Era<\/p>\n\n

During the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic, CRIMT’s Partnership Project on Institutional Experimentation and Work Improvement held two exploratory roundtables on the pandemic, its disruptive effects on work and employment, and the organizational and institutional experiments it is generating. The first in the series, the April 30, 2020 roundtable featured contributions from Glenn Morgan<\/strong> (Perspectives on Work Research Group – Faculty of Social Sciences and Law, University of Bristol), Valeria Pulignano<\/strong> (KU Leuven), Ian Greer <\/strong>(ILR School, Cornell University), Shelagh Campbell <\/strong>(University of Regina) and Kevin Banks<\/strong> (CLCW, Queen’s University).<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

26 February 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Dami\u00e1n Pierbattisti<\/strong> <\/strong>(University of Buenos Aires)<\/p>\n\n

Models of Capitalism and Labor Institutions: The Case of Argentina 2003-2019<\/p>\n\n

On Wednesday, February 26, 2020, Dami\u00e1n Pierbattisti<\/strong>, Professor of Sociology at the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Buenos Aires, gave a conference entitled: Models of Capitalism and Labor Institutions: the Case of Argentina 2003-2019<\/em>. This event was organized jointly by CRIMT and the Department of Human Resources Management at HEC Montr\u00e9al.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

5 February 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Barry Eidlin <\/strong>(McGill University), Mathieu Dupuis <\/strong>(T\u00c9LUQ), Jane Jenson <\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al), Nelson Lichtenstein <\/strong>(UC Santa Barbara), Sara Slinn <\/strong>(Osgoode Hall Law School, York University)<\/p>\n\n

Author Meets Critics: <\/strong>Labor and the Class Idea in the United States and Canada by Barry Eidlin<\/p>\n\n

Why are unions weaker in the US than in Canada, two otherwise similar countries? This difference has shaped politics, policy, and levels of inequality. Conventional wisdom points to differences in political cultures, party systems, and labor laws. But Barry Eidlin’s systematic analysis of archival and statistical data shows the limits of conventional wisdom, and presents a novel explanation for the cross-border difference. He shows that it resulted from different ruling party responses to worker upsurge during the Great Depression and World War II. Paradoxically, US labor’s long-term decline resulted from what was initially a more pro-labor ruling party response, while Canadian labor’s relative long-term strength resulted from a more hostile ruling party response. These struggles embedded ‘the class idea’ more deeply in policies, institutions, and practices than in the US. In an age of growing economic inequality and broken systems of political representation, Eidlin’s analysis offers insight for those seeking to understand these trends, as well as those seeking to change them.<\/p>\n\n

After presenting an outline of his book Labor and the Class Idea in the United States and Canada<\/em>, Barry Eidlin<\/strong>, Professor in the Department of Sociology at McGill University and CRMTco-researcher at CRIMT, welcomed comments from Mathieu Dupuis (T\u00c9LUQ), Jane Jenson (Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al), Nelson Lichtenstein (UC Santa Barbara) and Sara Slinn (Osgoode Hall Law School, York University).<\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

27 January 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Florence Palpacuer <\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 de Montpellier), Gregor Murray <\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al)<\/p>\n\n

Globalization and Global Value Chains: Thinking Management and Union Activism<\/p>\n\n

Over the last 20 years, the rise and generalization of multinational corporations and global value chains has raised a series of questions about how the actors of corporate regulation and civil society are taking their demands to the international level. Through the reading of two recent texts proposed by Florence Palpacuer<\/strong> (University of Montpellier) and Gregor Murray <\/strong>(University of Montreal), this seminar aimed to deepen the understanding of the activism of managers, unions and members of civil society in this complex context and to think about responsible international management.

Discussants:<\/strong> Eric Cornuel, Marine De Ridder, Coralie Helleputte and Am\u00e9lie Jacquemin<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

23 January 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Christophe Degryse <\/strong>(European Trade Union Institute)<\/p>\n\n\n

Work in the Platform Economy<\/p>\n\n\n

On Thursday, January 23, 2020, Christophe Degryse<\/strong>, head of the Foresight Unit at the European Trade Union Institute and co-researcher at CRIMT, gave a conference on work in the platform economy. The digitization of the economy has, in this decade of 2010, made a remarkable entry into the public debate in industrialized countries. Artificial intelligence, robotics, the Internet of Things, the widespread use of smartphones and tablets, and mobile applications ; it was enough to affirm that we were witnessing a new industrial revolution, the fourth of its kind. In this presentation, the author examined the potential impact of one of the products of the so-called 4th<\/sup> industrial revolution – namely the development of the platform economy – on work and the foundations of this social model.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

8 January 2020<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Romain Bertrand <\/strong>(IRISSO – Universit\u00e9 Paris-Dauphine)<\/p>\n\n

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Workplace: Building a “Virtual Assistant” in the Banking-Insurance Sector<\/p>\n\n

Should we expect major transformations in employment and work due to the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Is a wave of automation in the works because of the possibilities of these disruptive technologies?<\/p>\n\n

Romain Bertrand<\/strong>, PhD candidate at IRISSO (Universit\u00e9 Paris-Dauphine) and research intern at CRIMT, presented the main lines of his thesis, which aims to contribute to the sociological study of the workplace transformations brought by Machine Learning applications. The seminar was an opportunity for the author to share the first results of a survey (still in progress), which follows the development of a tool introduced by IBM consultants in one of France’s major insurance company.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

17 October 2019<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Xin Wang<\/strong> <\/strong>(The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)<\/p>\n\n

To Be a Respected World-class Company: The reform and development of large companies in China<\/p>\n\n

This seminar, organized by CRIMT in collaboration with the Chair in Governance and Business Law of the Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al’s Faculty of Law, addressed the reform and development of large companies in China, one of the areas of interest of Professor Xin Wang<\/strong>, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences who specializes in SOE reform, governance and corporate social responsibility.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

11 October 2019<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Chiara Benassi <\/strong>(King’s College London)<\/p>\n\n

How Do Employers Choose Between Different Types of Nonstandard Work? Costs, Control and Institutional Toying<\/p>\n\n

With the growing range of non-standard jobs, it is important to consider how employers choose among these different types of occupations. Based on the existing literature, this seminar aimed to distinguish between non-standard contracts on the basis of cost and control and then to make proposals on how these differences influence employer choice. Chiara Benassi <\/strong>outlined four main mechanisms for institutional redesign and demonstrated how these strategies provide more opportunities for employers when choosing a non-standard type of employment.<\/p>\n\n

Chiara Benassi<\/strong> teaches Human Resources Management at King’s College London. Her research focuses on comparative labour relations and the sociology of work.<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

4 October 2019<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

H\u00e8la Yousfi <\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 Paris Dauphine)<\/p>\n\n

Social Movements and the Myth of Spontaneity. Analysis of the Process of Democratic Revolution in Tunisia<\/p>\n\n

Recent events such as the Occupy wall street movements or what has been called the “Arab Spring” have provoked a renewed interest in the dialogue between two disciplines: the theories of organization and the theories of social movements. However, it is still difficult to emerge from a binary opposition between, on the one hand, a monolithic approach to organization in the analysis of the organizational challenges of social movements and an increasing mistrust of organizational bureaucracy that would suppress the capacity to disrupt the established order, on the other hand. Using an ethnographic approach, this seminar aimed to overcome this dichotomy by providing a detailed examination of the complex role played by the UGTT (General Union of Tunisian Labor) in the revolutionary process in Tunisia. The author showed that spontaneity and organization are different aspects of a protest movement and that they co-exist in a perpetual dialectical relationship. This work is also in dialogue with research on how the institutional and political context as well as internal organizational dynamics shape the development of a social movement and its impact\/outcome.

Organized in collaboration with the Human Resources Management Department of HEC Montr\u00e9al, this seminar explored the main lines of this argument. H\u00e8la Yousfi is a lecturer at the University Paris-Dauphine-PSL. Her field of expertise is the sociology of organizations. She has worked and published on the influence of political culture on the functioning of companies in Arab countries.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

3 October 2019<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ron McCallum <\/strong>(University of Sydney)<\/p>\n\n\n

Being Born Blind, Becoming a Labour Lawyer and the Magic of Computer- based Adaptive Technology<\/p>\n\n

Following the publication of his memoirs Born at the Right Time<\/em>, Ron McCallum<\/strong> recounted in this seminar the great moments of his personal and professional life, and introduced us to the magic of adaptive computer technologies. A CRIMT-affiliated researcher, Ron McCallum has published numerous books, including The Legal Protection of Refugees with Disabilities. Forgotten and Invisible?<\/em> but has also accomplished great things, such as chairing the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

9 <\/b>April<\/span> 2019<\/b><\/font><\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n

Peter Turnbull <\/strong>(University of Bristol)<\/p>\n\n

Can work get any worse? Working in the Single European Market<\/p>\n\n

In this seminar organized by CPOW<\/strong>, Professor Peter Turnbull<\/strong> drew on his work on transportation to touch on some of the themes of the CRIMT Project on Institutional Experimentation and Work Improvement.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n

An initiative of<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

15 March 2019<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Rachid Filali-Meknassi <\/strong>(Universit\u00e9 Mohammed V de Rabat)<\/p>\n\n

CRIMT’s series of interviews with experts from the world of work<\/p>\n\n

A member of the ILO Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, Rachid Filali-Meknassi <\/strong>is a doctor of law and former professor of higher education at Mohammed V University in Rabat. He is the author of numerous books on social and labour law. He is also interested in the issue of human rights and was one of the founders of the Moroccan Human Rights Association in the late 1970s. He is a member of the Higher Council of Education, Training and Scientific Research of Morocco, a consultant to national and international government agencies, including the World Bank, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and UNICEF, and was national coordinator of the project “Sustainable Development through the Global Compact”, ILO (2005-2008).<\/p>\n\n

This master class made it possible to retrace Professor Filali-Meknassi’s professional career, and to address various issues related to the evolution of labour law and industrial relations in Morocco.<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

27 February 2019<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Chang-Hee Lee <\/span>(Director of the ILO office in Vietnam)<\/p>\n\n

CRIMT’s series of interviews with experts from the world of work<\/p>\n\n

Chang-Hee Lee, Director of the International Labour Organization’s Office in Vietnam, is one of Asia’s leading specialists in industrial relations, particularly in the Chinese and Vietnamese cases.<\/p>\n\n

While in Montreal, he agreed to engage in an informal exchange with CRIMT’s co-researchers on the latest trends in labour and employment in Asia, as well as the research challenges posed by these changing work regimes.<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

5 December 2018<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fotios Bregiannis<\/strong><\/span> (UCLouvain)<\/p>\n\n\n

The Right to Know in the Environment of the Multinational Enterprise (MNE) – A proposed model of corporate information regimes evaluation<\/p>\n\n

Informational power is an important aspect of societal relations governed by hierarchy and\/or inequality. The powerful party (the state, the MNE or other) exercises and reproduces its power through the control it exerts on sensitive information relevant to the minor party. Numerous legislative interventions at national or international level have the declared role to bridge this informational gap in the MNE. Those instruments have industrial relations, labour law and CSR backgrounds. But the question remains: How could we evaluate these instruments with coherent criteria? This intervention proposes a framework based on the information management concept of the information life-cycle. 

In this intervention, Fotios Bregiannis, doctoral candidate at UCLouvain and an intern at CRIMT, proposed a framework based on the concept of information life cycle management.<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

5 December 2018<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kamila Moula\u00ef<\/strong><\/span> (UCLouvain)<\/p>\n\n\n

What Norms are Internalized by Workers in a Context of Coexistence with Machines? An exploration of cashier\u2019s experience through the lens of ableism<\/p>\n\n

The retail sector has profoundly changed the last decade. In her qualitative study, Kamila Moula\u00ef investigates the individual impact of the co-existence of cashiers with an emerging form of machine, the self-service checkout. After a philosophical contextualization of the technical environment, she proposed to read norms internalized by cashiers and their logic from the lens of ableism. Whereas the literature on disability and ableism reveals the processes of a comparison with normative able human bodies, her study, rooted in Anders\u2019 philosophical material, directs attention towards bodies that may conventionally be considered able, and yet are experiencing disability-related feelings when comparing themselves to a machine.<\/p>\n\n

Through an in-depth analysis, the author revealed that there is a conceptualisation of the ideal worker that epitomises the characteristics of a machine, as well as a deep devaluation of the human subjective potential at work.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

30 January 2018<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Mary Crock & Ron McCallum<\/strong><\/span> (University of Sydney)<\/p>\n\n

A New Kid on The Block: Australia\u2019s Fair Work Ombudsman and The Protection of Vulnerable Workers<\/p>\n\n

In this seminar, Mary Crock<\/strong> and Ron McCallum<\/strong>, both from the University of Sydney, outlined the history of the enforcement of wages under Australia\u2019s classical conciliation and arbitration system. Originally only trade unions could enforce awards. However, in 1930, the Government appointed arbitration inspectors. With the advent of globalisation and the deregulation of Australian labour, trade union membership declined, and there was less capacity for trade union enforcement. The authors discussed arbitration inspectoral enforcement under the deregulated labour laws from 1996 -2007 and examined the work of the Fair work Ombudsman in investigating complaints and taking curial action to penalise recalcitrant employers and recover back-pay.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

15 September 2017<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ruth Barton<\/strong><\/span> <\/b>(University of Tasmania)<\/p>\n\n\n

\u201cOur Tarkine, Our Future\u201d: The Australian Workers Union Use of Narratives Around Place and Community in West and North West Tasmania<\/p>\n\n

On Friday, September 15, 2017, Ruth Barton<\/strong>, CRIMT co-investigator and professor at the University of Tasmania, delivered a conference entitled “OurTarkine, Our Future”: The Australian Workers Union Use of Narratives Around Place and Community in West and North West Tasmania, Australia<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n

The Australian Workers Union represents the miners on the West Coast of Tasmania. When the future of mining on much of the West Coast was threatened by the environmentalists\u2019 proposed National Heritage listing of the Tarkine region, the union campaigned to prevent the listing. Using imagery and its embeddedness in place, the AWU was able to use a sense of place, memory and identity to construct a community campaign that moved beyond the West Coast into the North West Coast where many of the miners lived. The union was able to renew its narrative resources by moving work out of the workplace and into the Tarkine. In this way the AWU was able to mobilise community support and shift political power to the local where workers could regain control over their lives and the place where they lived and worked.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

22 June 2017<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Aiqing Zheng<\/strong><\/strong><\/span> (Renmin University)<\/p>\n\n\n

L\u2019\u00e9volution r\u00e9cente du droit du travail chinois<\/p>\n\n

On Thursday, June 22, 2017, Professor Aiqing Zheng<\/strong>, a researcher at the Faculty of Law of Renmin University, China, delivered a lecture at CRIMT entitled Recent Developments in Chinese Labour Law<\/em>. Gilles Trudeau<\/strong>, co-researcher at CRIMT and professor at the Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al’s Faculty of Law, chaired the seminar.<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n

17 May 2017<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

Guglielmo Meardi<\/strong><\/strong><\/span> (University of Warwick)<\/p>\n\n

Neoliberal Convergence or New Statism? European Integration and Changes in European industrial Relations Since Maastricht (1992-2017)<\/p>\n\n

On Wednesday, May 17, 2017, Guglielmo Meardi<\/strong>, Professor of Industrial Relations and Director of the Industrial Relations Research Unit at the University of Warwick, delivered a lecture entitled Neoliberal Convergence or New Statism? European integration and changes in European industrial relations since Maastricht (1992-2017).<\/em><\/p>\n\n

In this seminar, the author analyzed industrial relations change in the six largest EU countries since 1992 in relation to increased internationalisation pressures. Based on qualitative and quantitative analysis, it distinguishes between associational and state governance, and detects that despite a predominant, but not universal, trend of weakening trade unions and collective bargaining, no overall liberalisation has occurred in the political regulation of employment (employment policies, welfare state, labour law, state support to collective bargaining, public sector). The implication is that, against portrayals of one-dimensional neoliberal convergence, economic internationalisation interacts with state-specific political institutions and even provokes their reaction and tightening.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

16 April 2024 Hybrid seminar […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-templates\/template_fullwidth.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5922","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5922"}],"version-history":[{"count":124,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5922\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20612,"href":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5922\/revisions\/20612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crimt.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}